Limitless: An AI Podcast

Ejaaz:
The number one question we keep getting asked is, will AI replace my job?

Ejaaz:
Well, now we have an answer. The godfather of AI, Andrej Karpathy,

Ejaaz:
released a report which tells us which jobs are at most risk of being replaced by AI.

Ejaaz:
And it's not quite what you might think. Jobs like financial analysts,

Ejaaz:
computer programming, and transcriptioning are at most risk.

Ejaaz:
But what shocks me the most are the ones that are the safest.

Ejaaz:
Plumbing, bartending, being a mechanic.

Ejaaz:
Turns out AI won't replace manual labor because it just doesn't have any hands.

Ejaaz:
It still requires human bodies. But on the other hand, if your job involves a computer,

Ejaaz:
You might be kind of cooked at this point, but it's not all doom and gloom.

Ejaaz:
The report measures AI exposure, which doesn't necessarily imply replacement,

Ejaaz:
but rather the evolution of job roles.

Ejaaz:
What your job looks like today is very much going to look very different a few years from now.

Josh:
Yeah. So a brief timeline on how all this stuff unfolded. On Saturday morning,

Josh:
Andre Carpathy, this is the guy who coined Vibe Coding. He co-founded OpenAI.

Josh:
He led AI at Tesla. I mean, this is the guy. He spent a few hours Vibe Coding

Josh:
this project that scores every job in America on a zero to one scale based on,

Josh:
like you said, Ejaz, how exposed it is to AI.

Josh:
Now, this is not a direct correlation to how likely it is to be replaced,

Josh:
although there is some indication of that.

Josh:
Basically, he publishes this project and it goes absolutely nuclear.

Josh:
Elon's replying, Fortune picks it up.

Josh:
It's in all of the major publications, all within hours.

Josh:
And then he deleted the repo. It was gone off of the web completely and entirely.

Josh:
Thankfully, I was playing around with it that night. I forked the repo and I

Josh:
republished it on GitHub.

Josh:
And that's what we're looking at here. And this is the project.

Josh:
This is what shows all these jobs that are going to be replaced.

Josh:
If you see your job here, that's okay.

Josh:
We're going to walk through a bunch of categories about what is most affected,

Josh:
what is least affected, and I guess kind of the impact that AI is going to have.

Josh:
So, Ejaz, there's some high numbers here on this left tab here that maybe we

Josh:
could start by walking through.

Ejaaz:
Yeah. So, what you're looking at on the left is the total number of jobs that

Ejaaz:
are affected, and it's quite a big number. It's almost 150 million.

Ejaaz:
Now, if you scroll down, you'll see the number of, or the amount of wages that

Ejaaz:
are exposed to potentially being automated by AI, $3.7 trillion.

Ejaaz:
That is like one of the larger numbers that we've seen when it comes to displacement.

Ejaaz:
But if I shift your focus to the right here on the main graphic,

Ejaaz:
you notice that there's a lot of red and a lot of green. It's pretty self-explanatory.

Ejaaz:
If you see your job and it's red, it's at most risk. It's at the highest exposure.

Ejaaz:
If it's green, it's probably the most safest.

Ejaaz:
So let's start with the worst, medical transcriptionists.

Josh:
AI exposure 10 out of 10.

Ejaaz:
Josh, we're looking at a median pay of almost $40,000 and they have 44,000 jobs.

Ejaaz:
That do this in the U.S. How much is that worth?

Josh:
That is about $1.65 billion of value that has 10 out of 10 exposure.

Josh:
Now, there aren't many 10 out of 10s. In fact, I think this might be the only

Josh:
one that is truly 10 out of 10. I'm not going to lie, this one might be cooked.

Josh:
And the way this is categorized is kind of in these like higher level brackets.

Josh:
So there's the 10 out of 10, which is the medical transcriptionist.

Josh:
If you are a transcriptionist, I would work very hard to try to use AI and maintain

Josh:
your position as best as possible.

Josh:
But then beneath that, I think one of the categories that surprised a lot of

Josh:
people is a very popular subcategory of jobs, which is like the software developers,

Josh:
the designers, the people who are working on computers every single day.

Josh:
A lot of these jobs are at an eight or a nine out of 10. They're very high relative to a lot of others.

Ejaaz:
And there's a lot of them. If you look at the software engineering section,

Ejaaz:
we've got an average median pay of $130,000 a year, but there are almost 2 million of these jobs.

Ejaaz:
And this is taken from like, I think 2024 data.

Ejaaz:
So it's probably a lot more today, but it's not just technical roles.

Ejaaz:
It's also graphic designers, data scientists. They're all exposed.

Josh:
Wait, did I see anything about podcasting in there? Oh, I saw video production. Oh, that seems scary.

Ejaaz:
No, you know what, Josh? I actually haven't seen this at all.

Ejaaz:
So I think we're actually safe and I'm going to choose to ignore it and not look for it.

Ejaaz:
But market research analysts are exposed.

Ejaaz:
Customer service reps, 2.8 million jobs, nine out of 10 general office clerks.

Ejaaz:
So what I'm seeing here, I'm noticing a trend in the jobs that are affected.

Ejaaz:
It largely involves computer-based tasks, but ones that are very repetitious

Ejaaz:
and most likely to be automated, kind of like low-hanging fruit,

Ejaaz:
like back office work, like moving files around, basic analyst stuff.

Ejaaz:
The other trend I'm noticing is these sound a lot like entry-level jobs, Josh.

Ejaaz:
Like when I'm reading the descriptions of software engineers here,

Ejaaz:
it's mainly talking about like tasks that junior-level engineers might do or

Ejaaz:
junior-level graphic designers might do,

Ejaaz:
which kind of mirrors the trends that we're seeing on the job market right now,

Ejaaz:
where entry-level jobs in the U.S. at least are completely evaporating.

Josh:
And it's also important to note that the AI exposure does not directly correlate to the job loss.

Josh:
It's just the involvement of AI in the actual job. So what we're seeing at companies

Josh:
like Anthropic, OpenAI, the companies that are building this software,

Josh:
they're hiring faster than ever.

Josh:
And they're limited purely by the constraint of quality people to hire versus

Josh:
the actual need and the want to hire.

Josh:
There are some places in which this could harm people. So like if you're a software

Josh:
developer right now, if you're a designer right now, Now, AI is such a great tool for leverage.

Josh:
You can do so much more. You can get so much more output if you use these tools for leverage.

Josh:
In the case that you don't, or in the case that you can't, in the case of the

Josh:
medical transcriptionist, in which it literally is just like dictating notes

Josh:
into a page, it's going to be tough.

Josh:
So this isn't directly a job replacement board, but it just shows how much of

Josh:
an impact AI will actually have on your job.

Josh:
Now, there's a lot on this board that is green.

Josh:
And that means that not only is AI not coming to replace the job,

Josh:
but there's not much AI involvement,

Josh:
all in the job. And I think this is a bigger conversation around these lagging

Josh:
indicators in the physical world where AI is wreaking havoc on software.

Josh:
But when it comes to just your dude down the street who's coming to fix your

Josh:
sink or your toilet or paint the walls, there is no competition for that at all, right?

Ejaaz:
Yeah, it's completely inverted. Where typically technology advances will kind

Ejaaz:
of kill blue collar jobs or completely evolve that landscape,

Ejaaz:
we're seeing the opposite here.

Ejaaz:
So if you're a janitor or a building cleaner, one out of 10,

Ejaaz:
you're not exposed, you're safe.

Ejaaz:
If you're a grounds maintenance worker, again, safe.

Ejaaz:
If you are working in any kind of labor or construction, home health perspectives,

Ejaaz:
things that require your hands or a human body or human intuition in that sense,

Ejaaz:
you're pretty much safe for now.

Ejaaz:
And the main reason for this is probably obvious.

Ejaaz:
AI or AI models can only really talk and do computer-based tasks.

Ejaaz:
They can spit out characters and words and numbers and analysis,

Ejaaz:
but they can't action that in the physical world yet.

Ejaaz:
Robotics is still comparatively very young at this point, a young industry,

Ejaaz:
and it's probably going to advance, but it's going to take a little longer than

Ejaaz:
AI LLMs will right now. And it's a really stark contrast.

Ejaaz:
Like when I think about technology replacing people's jobs, I always think that

Ejaaz:
it might start from the bottom up.

Ejaaz:
But I think this is a clear example of it happening from the top down.

Josh:
Yeah. And it's funny because when you look at the people most exposed,

Josh:
they're generally the highest earners.

Josh:
The people least exposed are the lowest earners.

Josh:
When you look at the average, the median pay for all these jobs,

Josh:
it's normally the ones with the highest median pay that are most susceptible.

Josh:
And I think it's because, I mean, generally speaking, software has been such

Josh:
a lever in terms of how much productive output you can generate relative to

Josh:
the physical world in which you are one person.

Josh:
And that lever has created a lot of value. But now that value is

Josh:
able to start to become either subsidized or replaced by

Josh:
these ai tools so long as you're not using them for the

Josh:
leverage yourself so it's this interesting chart i

Josh:
really enjoyed looking through it like if you are what do we have child care

Josh:
worker safe general maintenance are safe software developers not cashiers maybe

Josh:
not there's this middle section that i find interesting where it's like the

Josh:
the heavy tractor drivers kind of towards the top and there's the retail sales

Josh:
workers and the cashiers so if you're in in retail you're probably okay for

Josh:
now is there For anyone who's truly safe EJS who has zero exposure to AI?

Ejaaz:
I can't find it right now because it's probably minuscule. But if you are a

Ejaaz:
truck driver, you are at a zero out of 10 AI exposure.

Ejaaz:
So you're the safest job in America and in the world right now. Congrats.

Josh:
And I hope you're listening to Limitless on your truck ride this morning. Yeah, exactly.

Ejaaz:
But anyway, to kind of like tie a loop around this, the directional trend is pretty clear.

Ejaaz:
AI is going to automate a large amount of jobs. It's not just going to be in

Ejaaz:
one industry or one vertical, it's going to be across the entire board.

Ejaaz:
And actually, Elon had a very poignant tweet that he put out here,

Ejaaz:
which was he said, all jobs will be optional, there will be universal high income.

Ejaaz:
And this was in response to Carpathie releasing this report.

Ejaaz:
And the point that he's making here is no job is safe.

Ejaaz:
But equally, the optimistic take is in a world where no job is safe and humans

Ejaaz:
don't really have a purpose when it comes to whether it's physical or software

Ejaaz:
based labor, they will still get paid not just a basic income,

Ejaaz:
but a very high amount of money, which I'm still trying to wrap my head around

Ejaaz:
and understand, but it gives us a more optimistic end to this story.

Josh:
Yeah. And some caveats too, this doesn't cover the entire US job economy.

Josh:
I mean, the way it works is the data source you scraped 342 occupations from

Josh:
the Bureau of Labor Statistics. And this covers about 143 million total U.S. jobs.

Josh:
And then he fed that into ChatGPT, scored each one.

Josh:
So this is a very generalized approach that isn't quite accurate,

Josh:
but it's enough to make you think about it, right?

Josh:
It's enough to kind of give you a generalized sense of where things are going, who's most affected.

Josh:
Overall, the weighted average of the AI impact was 4.9 out of 10.

Josh:
So almost everyone is feeling the effect of this to some extent.

Josh:
Jobs paying over $100,000 a year, like we mentioned, 6.7, which is much higher

Josh:
than jobs paying under $35,000 a year, which is 3.4.

Josh:
And then 42% of all jobs scored seven or higher, representing 60 million workers

Josh:
and $3.7 trillion in wages.

Josh:
So the impact is real. I think when you talk to people who are employing AI,

Josh:
they're not quite seeing the productive output just yet, whereas replacing jobs.

Josh:
But the impact of this was clearly noticed because shortly after publishing

Josh:
this, Andre deleted it. He took down the entire thing.

Ejaaz:
He deleted it because of this exact response that it conjured up.

Ejaaz:
Everyone started freaking out and thinking, oh my God, my job has a 50% risk

Ejaaz:
of getting replaced by AI.

Ejaaz:
I don't know how much time I have left. I should start panicking.

Ejaaz:
And the reason why he deleted it was he said, listen, this was a two-hour Vibe-coded

Ejaaz:
project that I did over the weekend.

Ejaaz:
I didn't even announce it online. You guys just found it and you've massively

Ejaaz:
extrapolated it into your own story and caused fear.

Ejaaz:
And his point is, this is based off of raw data. But again, we don't quite know

Ejaaz:
how any of this is going to pan out. and I'm likely going to be very wrong about it.

Ejaaz:
The point he made was, although these jobs are exposed to AI,

Ejaaz:
it's not necessarily going to take away people's jobs.

Ejaaz:
It's going to evolve those roles into different kinds of jobs.

Ejaaz:
Like for example, if we take software engineering, everyone's freaking out about AI replacing coders.

Ejaaz:
The truth is the coders will just become managers of AI agents that do the code for them.

Ejaaz:
Have we ever had a job like that before? No. So it's the same as like the industrial

Ejaaz:
revolution where we have this like weird evolutionary period but we don't quite

Ejaaz:
know what's happening, but we know that hopefully we're going to be okay by the end of it.

Josh:
Yeah, and he followed up that original post with, the exposure was scored by

Josh:
an LLM based on how digital the job is.

Josh:
This has no bearing on what actually happens to these occupations,

Josh:
which has to do with demand, elasticity, and a lot more. This is...

Josh:
Noteworthy. And I think, again, the backlash comes from, there are strong headwinds

Josh:
that point the opposite direction, right?

Josh:
Like just recently we had a jobs report that came out in February where the

Josh:
US economy lost 92,000 jobs in February on unemployment rate.

Josh:
It ticked back up to 4.4%. Healthcare, which was an industry that was really

Josh:
holding the jobs economy together, it shed 28,000 jobs in February and December

Josh:
was then revised down to lose 17,000.

Josh:
So unemployment rate is much higher.

Josh:
I mean, when you look at this chart, if you scroll down just a little bit more,

Josh:
it shows there's some serious losses that haven't been happening in a couple years.

Josh:
Is this a lagging indicator of the overhiring that happened in COVID?

Josh:
Is this an effect of AI? It's probably a mixture of sorts.

Josh:
We can go to our friends over at Polymarket to kind of seek truth and understand

Josh:
this a little bit better.

Josh:
And we'll take a look at this Poly Market that shows how many jobs will be added in March.

Josh:
Now, you'll notice the number was much higher recently

Josh:
before crashing down um of 50 to

Josh:
100k we were at what it was 44 and

Josh:
now it's dropped down to significantly less

Josh:
uh under 30 so it looks like the polymarket

Josh:
is kind of guiding towards a worse jobs report than we think how high will u.s

Josh:
employment go in 2026 there is a 58 chance now that it will be up to over five

Josh:
percent um which is noteworthy because we're currently at 4.4 so this is a trend

Josh:
that polymarket sees happening and then i guess we have to ask the question.

Josh:
Will there be a u.s recession caused by this by the end of 2026 thankfully

Josh:
the number is staying strong at 31 and trending

Josh:
downwards it looks like over the course of the time that this market's been

Josh:
in place so it seems like maybe we're losing some jobs but it's not going to

Josh:
cause recession and it's just it's a good time to learn how to use these ai

Josh:
tools leverage them for your own well-being for your own productive gain and

Josh:
thank you very much for polymarket for sponsoring this part of episode.

Ejaaz:
I think it's important to mention that Carpity's report doesn't live in a silo.

Ejaaz:
There are a bunch of other reports and studies which actually confirm his data.

Ejaaz:
Anthropic themselves released a study a few weeks ago, which looked at the labor market impacts of AI.

Ejaaz:
And they had this pretty crazy chart on the left here, which basically shows

Ejaaz:
the ability for AI to automate particular jobs or skills.

Ejaaz:
So like business and finance, computer and math, you'll see the blue section

Ejaaz:
shows that AI can basically do a lot of that job right now.

Ejaaz:
And then the red basically shows how much AI has actually penetrated that particular

Ejaaz:
job or market in the real world.

Ejaaz:
So the point being made here is AI today can actually do a lot of the work that

Ejaaz:
a lot of human employees and workers do.

Ejaaz:
It just hasn't diffused yet, which is a lot of scarier of a proposition than I initially thought.

Ejaaz:
I thought, okay, well, AI isn't just smart enough yet. And so it's going to take some time.

Ejaaz:
But the truth is, it's already here. We just haven't dispersed it into everyone's

Ejaaz:
hands just yet. And it's more of an adoption issue going forwards.

Josh:
And this is the take I think a lot of people might not realize when they want to ask AI to slow down.

Josh:
They want to decelerate. And the reality is that these models are so powerful

Josh:
now, and they're so capable, that it's no longer a matter of increased intelligence.

Josh:
It's more a matter of diffusion.

Josh:
I find that most of the impact that AI will have on the world around us we have

Josh:
the models that are sufficient in order to act that enact that change it's like.

Josh:
What do we need more intelligent models for? Solving new physics,

Josh:
solving new math, solving new science for solving novel breakthroughs.

Josh:
But the things that we do every day, it's really a dispersion problem.

Josh:
It's a matter of getting the AI into these systems and automating them because

Josh:
it exists today. It is here.

Josh:
And I think one of the I mean, if you don't believe us, we can defer to Elon's

Josh:
post, which I think was one of the more noteworthy comments on this whole Andre

Josh:
story, because he replied to it saying all jobs will be optional.

Josh:
There will be universal high income.

Josh:
And I think he really believes this. I've listened to Elon in a series of conversations

Josh:
in which he's kind of laid out the path for the future and what that looks like.

Josh:
And it seems like it's going to be a very difficult train to stop,

Josh:
particularly once we get humanoid robots.

Josh:
So one of the problems with this publication that a lot of people mentioned

Josh:
on X is that it doesn't factor into account what the world looks like.

Josh:
Once AI breaks out of its box, once there are physical robots kind of moving

Josh:
around, once there are robots in factories, robots going down the street.

Josh:
Recently, last weekend, Travis Kalanick released his new company,

Josh:
the founder of Uber. He created the follow-up called Atoms.

Josh:
And Atoms is entirely based around moving these physical atoms and automating

Josh:
the movement of these atoms.

Josh:
So I think as we start to move forward into the Elon-based world,

Josh:
into the Travis-based world, where the AI breaks out of the box.

Josh:
Oh yeah, here we have it here.

Josh:
This is the vision from Travis Kalanick's new company named Atoms.

Josh:
And the idea is that AI is breaking out of a box. It is becoming physically

Josh:
manifested through these robots,

Josh:
these robots will become so efficient that the cost of doing a productive service

Josh:
or task will basically collapse to the net goods, the cost of the net goods

Josh:
and the cost of the energy expenditure.

Josh:
And that labor cost will be removed from the equation. And a lot of these people

Josh:
are betting their entire companies on this equation being true.

Ejaaz:
The craziest part, just going back to this Anthropic report,

Ejaaz:
Josh, is this came from a frontier AI lab. So they're building the tools

Ejaaz:
that's going to replace or automate a bunch of this stuff.

Ejaaz:
So it's a stark display of honesty and transparency, which I'm quite impressed by.

Ejaaz:
But the other point I want to make, and I want to end on a positive note,

Ejaaz:
is I think a lot of this AI stuff is going to result in more demand for human

Ejaaz:
jobs, which might be a very hot take at this point.

Ejaaz:
But I think, what's the law, Josh, where if we have more of the thing,

Ejaaz:
it actually leads to a higher demand?

Josh:
That is Jevons Paradox, my friend.

Ejaaz:
Thank you, Jevons Paradox. So Jevons Paradox basically states that if you have

Ejaaz:
more supply of something, let's say more compute out there, you might argue

Ejaaz:
that, okay, well, it's going to cheapen the use of AI.

Ejaaz:
The result is often the opposite, which is more people can do things with this

Ejaaz:
cheap AI. So they start creating more jobs and more use cases and consumption

Ejaaz:
and production absolutely go exponential.

Ejaaz:
And that's what I think is going to happen in the job market.

Ejaaz:
I think initially we're going to come across a bit of turmoil because people

Ejaaz:
don't really know what that next level of their job looks like.

Ejaaz:
But once things settle, once the dust settles and once people realize,

Ejaaz:
oh, we're living in this new world where AI agents can do things for me,

Ejaaz:
where my personal agent can handle all my payments and shopping and all that

Ejaaz:
kind of stuff for me, it frees you up to do much larger, bigger things.

Ejaaz:
Everyone can Vibe code their own app or product or launch their own company

Ejaaz:
and run it completely by themselves.

Ejaaz:
And that's a new world order, which I don't think people have wrapped their heads around.

Ejaaz:
I certainly haven't. I don't really know what that looks like,

Ejaaz:
but I do think it's gonna result in more jobs and maybe even higher pay per person.

Ejaaz:
I think people will become smarter as a result of AI and become more productive.

Josh:
And it's okay that we don't know what it looks like and I wouldn't expect anyone

Josh:
to know what it looks like. We're going from a very certain thing to a very uncertain thing.

Josh:
We know what the jobs market looks like. We had a very clear projection of what

Josh:
was going to happen and now that has changed.

Josh:
Does it mean that it will result in less jobs perhaps in the intermediary,

Josh:
in certain subcategories?

Josh:
Net net at the end of this, I mean, we've just, we've continued to evolve.

Josh:
We've gone through the agricultural revolution, the industrial revolution,

Josh:
each one of those times jobs disappeared and then reappeared in so much more abundance.

Josh:
And every time there is more opportunities, there are more fun opportunities.

Josh:
I mean, we solve a series of pretty mediocre problems. How many people really

Josh:
grow up wanting to be a medical transcriber? Is that your dream?

Josh:
Perhaps not. Perhaps it just enables you to do something that is more valuable,

Josh:
more exciting, more interesting.

Josh:
And I think we're going to continue to see that across the stack.

Josh:
So it's scary because it's uncertain.

Josh:
But I think the one certain thing is that we have continued to evolve to create

Josh:
more ways to spend our time that yield in a better result of living,

Josh:
a better quality of life for everyone.

Josh:
And I guess that's the optimistic hopeful take at the end is things will be

Josh:
uncertain. Things will be weird.

Josh:
It's moving very quickly. It's changing quickly, but hopefully everyone wins.

Josh:
And at the worst case scenario, Elon's giving universal high income for everyone, right?

Josh:
So yeah, I know. I'll take care of it. Yeah.

Ejaaz:
So to summarize, if you are a college grad right now, and you're freaking out

Ejaaz:
about what job you're going to have, the most highest leverage thing you can

Ejaaz:
do, even if you are currently employed, is to start using these AI tools.

Ejaaz:
Josh and I try and use it day to day in everything that we do,

Ejaaz:
whether it's research for the podcast, or whether it's trying to help teach

Ejaaz:
us ourselves something that we don't understand.

Ejaaz:
We use it for everything. And the point is, the earlier you can start using

Ejaaz:
these tools, the more acquainted you're going to become with what this new world

Ejaaz:
order is going to look like.

Ejaaz:
And the better proposed you are to evolving into whatever that job eventually

Ejaaz:
becomes. The jobs that you're probably going to take in the future probably

Ejaaz:
haven't even existed yet or haven't even been created yet.

Ejaaz:
So there is a cautiously optimistic approach to all of this.

Ejaaz:
And I truly think that if you use the tools, you will better set yourself up for success.

Josh:
Very well said. And if you're interested to see just how affected your industry

Josh:
is, we'll include a link to this project in the description so you can go and

Josh:
check it out for yourself.

Josh:
I would love to know what profession you're in.

Josh:
How cooked are you? How affected are you?

Josh:
If are you one of these yeah are you in the box are you one of these people

Josh:
uh let us know i'd love to know kind of what everyone's up to what is their

Josh:
exposure if they're worried or not i think there is a lot of worry um but some

Josh:
people also are kind of pragmatic about it they're like hey i'm actually using

Josh:
ai and it's making my job better it's making me better at my job so actually that's a good point like.

Ejaaz:
Are you using it in your job right now if you're if you see your job here and

Ejaaz:
it's red like are you do you see the opposite like are you getting more productive i'm curious

Josh:
Would love to know but that wraps up our andre carpathy

Josh:
jobs report episode um thank you as always for watching

Josh:
if you enjoyed this episode share with a friend to either

Josh:
scare them or enlighten them or excite them however whatever emotion

Josh:
you wish to elicit i hope it finds its way into their inbox um if you enjoyed

Josh:
please don't forget to rating it on your favorite podcast player commenting

Josh:
subscribing on youtube all the good things it's really been helpful we've been

Josh:
doing great the numbers are up and to the right we had our best week ever last

Josh:
week following a best week ever the week before.

Josh:
And it's all thanks to you and all the support. So thank you so much as always for watching.

Ejaaz:
Just one last thing. There's 3,500 newbies here, right? Is that right?

Ejaaz:
Did I get that figure right?

Josh:
We're getting a lot of new subscribers. They're pouring quick.

Ejaaz:
Thousands, thousands. Well, welcome. And if you are new to Limitless, please subscribe.

Ejaaz:
We post four times a week covering the latest and greatest things in AI and frontier tech.

Josh:
And publish a great newsletter twice a week, which is also linked in the description.

Josh:
You can find links to everything and anything down below. Thank you so much

Josh:
for watching as always and we will see you guys in the next one.